USE CASES

Start from a decision you already make.

Start from a decision you already make.

Start from a decision you already make.

Where to build. Which deal to back. Where to put regenerative money. Which parcel to protect. Every answer below comes from the same species layer; what changes is the decision, and what it costs to get it wrong.

Where to build. Which deal to back. Where to put regenerative money. Which parcel to protect. Every answer below comes from the same species layer; what changes is the decision, and what it costs to get it wrong.

Where to build. Which deal to back. Where to put regenerative money. Which parcel to protect. Every answer below comes from the same species layer; what changes is the decision, and what it costs to get it wrong.

Siting, screening & permitting

Commodity sourcing

Portfolio risk & lender due diligence

Credits & project developers

Platforms & consultancies

National systems

Disclosure & reporting

Conservation NGOs

01

CORPORATES · DEVELOPERS · LAND MANAGERS

Which site. Which parcel. Which deal. Ranked, with a reason you can repeat.

Which site. Which parcel. Which deal. Ranked, with a reason you can repeat.

Which site. Which parcel. Which deal. Ranked, with a reason you can repeat.

THE DECISION

Picking the site for a new facility. Screening hundreds of deals a year. Getting a permit or an impact assessment through without a late surprise. The most common question we hear, and almost nobody calls it a biodiversity problem.

WHAT CHANGES

You get a priority list of your portfolio, not a number: what is at stake for species at each place, which pressure drives it, and what to avoid before capital is committed.

WHAT YOU GET

SAVE Species and SAVE Ecosystems for every site, project or portfolio, with the pressure breakdown. Start from a point and radius if you have no boundaries yet.

→

Ranked site list with the reason behind each rank

→

Sensitive-location evidence for TNFD L4 and EIA screening

→

Comparable across countries and years

Discuss this →

FOOD, AG & COMMODITY TRADERS

Put regenerative money where the risk map is red.

Put regenerative money where the risk map is red.

Put regenerative money where the risk map is red.

THE DECISION

Cocoa, corn, soy and palm all depend on pollinators, pest control, soil and water that specific species provide. Those species are declining in some supply sheds faster than others, and the yield finds out last.

WHAT CHANGES

RISK scores every sourcing area by commodity and service, so you know which landscapes are quietly losing the inputs the crop runs on, and where an investment in the landscape pays back first.

WHAT YOU GET

RISK for your supply sheds, Species Habitat Index trends since 2001, and field surveys to verify what changed on the ground. A paid pilot that started in one region is already expanding to two more.

→

Sourcing-shed risk ranking by commodity

→

A dollar-framed case for regenerative investment

→

SBTN and CSRD E4 evidence from the same run

Discuss this →

02

03

BANKS · INVESTORS · INSURERS

Screen every holding on one standard. Then watch it move.

Screen every holding on one standard. Then watch it move.

Screen every holding on one standard. Then watch it move.

THE DECISION

A dated compliance window, a portfolio-wide screen to run, due diligence on a new loan, and no appetite for species detail unless it drives the number.

WHAT CHANGES

Dependencies and risk first. Per-asset and per-company fields slot into your own models, so you can go from a company’s impact on nature to its sourcing risk without switching datasets.

WHAT YOU GET

Portfolio-scale SAVE and RISK through a data license or the API. A proof of concept on about ten companies is the usual way in.

→

Exposure view across holdings

→

Screening at origination

→

TNFD-aligned portfolio disclosure

Discuss this →

CARBON & NATURE PROJECT DEVELOPERS · CREDIT BUYERS

Screen new projects in days. Give buyers a story that holds up.

Screen new projects in days. Give buyers a story that holds up.

Screen new projects in days. Give buyers a story that holds up.

THE DECISION

Hundreds of projects to assess a year, developer biodiversity data that is patchy, and a biodiversity budget that is usually zero. The risk is not the premium; it is the claim that cannot be defended.

WHAT CHANGES

Batch screening priced per site bucket, a clean baseline of what should be there, what is missing and what could return, and an annual narrative buyers can check.

WHAT YOU GET

SAVE for every project, SHI to show change, and one place to bring your eDNA, acoustic and camera-trap data together with the models. Plus a clear guide to what you may and may not claim.

→

Less fieldwork per project

→

A defensible baseline for every claim

→

Co-benefit evidence buyers trust

Discuss this →

04

05

ESG PLATFORMS · CONSULTANCIES · IN-HOUSE TEAMS

Be the species layer inside your product or engagement.

Be the species layer inside your product or engagement.

Be the species layer inside your product or engagement.

THE DECISION

Clients expect species-level answers at software speed. Cobbling layers together per project doesn’t scale, avian data is notoriously hard to get, and building global models in-house takes years.

WHAT CHANGES

Ship biodiversity features fast, with one consistent foundation across countries, teams and clients, and a methodology brief your assurance team can read.

WHAT YOU GET

API or Excel delivery, and multi-client licensing with a channel rate card. This is the largest group we work with.

→

Live metrics inside your tools

→

One method across every engagement

→

Annual refresh included

Discuss this →

GOVERNMENTS · MULTILATERALS

Monitor, permit and report on one method, from a protected area to the whole country.

Monitor, permit and report on one method, from a protected area to the whole country.

Monitor, permit and report on one method, from a protected area to the whole country.

THE DECISION

National commitments are judged on outcomes for species, not hectares on a map, and there is no budget to build a different monitoring system for every landscape.

WHAT CHANGES

One species foundation serves protected-area baselines, permitting, restoration priorities and GBF reporting, and gets better as local data comes in.

WHAT YOU GET

A national biodiversity information system built on our data and hosted in-country, on the government’s own GIS platform. GBF-aligned indicators (SHI, SPI), species lists on demand, and ingestion of acoustic, camera-trap and eDNA data.

→

Baselines for restoration zones and protected areas

→

GBF Target 1–4 reporting

→

Donor- and public-ready evidence

Discuss this →

06

07

SUSTAINABILITY & FINANCE TEAMS

Assess once. Reuse it in every framework.

Assess once. Reuse it in every framework.

Assess once. Reuse it in every framework.

THE DECISION

Bespoke, one-off assessments don’t compare across sites or years, won’t stand up to assurance, and have to be bought again for every new framework.

WHAT CHANGES

One evidence base with metrics that trace back to species, mapped to TNFD, CSRD, SBTN and GBF, and comparable year on year.

WHAT YOU GET

Workbook outputs mapped to each framework’s requirements, technical documentation for assurance, and plain-language labels on every output.

→

Assurance-ready metrics

→

Cross-framework reuse

→

Comparable year-on-year

Discuss this →

NGOS · LAND TRUSTS · FUNDERS

Make the case for the places that matter most, with numbers a funder can check.

Make the case for the places that matter most, with numbers a funder can check.

Make the case for the places that matter most, with numbers a funder can check.

THE DECISION

Choosing where limited conservation money goes, showing funders it worked, and doing both without a data team.

WHAT CHANGES

One consistent species foundation to prioritize candidate sites, track whether habitat is recovering, and report results funders can verify.

WHAT YOU GET

SAVE and the Species Habitat Index for every candidate site, with national data free on mol.org for non-commercial use, refreshed yearly so you can show what changed after you acted.

→

Prioritized sites with a reason

→

Year-on-year evidence for funders

→

Free national data for non-commercial use

Discuss this →

08

Don’t see your decision here? It probably still runs on the same data. Tell us about it.

Don’t see your decision here? It probably still runs on the same data. Tell us about it.

Don’t see your decision here? It probably still runs on the same data. Tell us about it.

Talk with us